Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Christ The King - Living the Liturgical Year

The Ending Feast of the Liturgical Year

Christ the King

Introduction:

“Christ the King is a title of Jesus based on several passages of Scripture and, in general, used by all Christians. The Catholic Church and many Protestant denominations, including Anglicans, Presbyterians, Lutherans and Methodists, celebrate, in honour of Christ under this title, the Feast of Christ the King on the last Sunday of the liturgical year, before a new year begins with the First Sunday of Advent (the earliest date of which is 27 November). The Feast of Christ the King is thus on the Sunday that falls between 20 and 26 November, inclusive”.[i] A few examples of scripture are: "Let Christ the King of Israel descend now from the cross, that we may see and believe. And they that were crucified with him reviled him." (Mark 15:32 KJV) "And they began to accuse him, saying , We found this fellow perverting the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar, saying that he himself is Christ a King." (Luke 23:2 KJV)

To start with we might keep in mind that, in our world today, the title of king is basically symbolic. There are only a few monarchs that are truly sovereign in a few countries that still refer to their head of state as king or queen. When America began, our forbearers came here to discover a new land that would give them new freedoms and opportunities without the tyranny of such rule. The American revolution eventually accomplished this and a new form of government was founded on law under the will of the people.

“In early times there was a belief in the "Divine Right of Kings." It was understood as a "doctrine in defense of monarchical absolutism, which asserted that kings derived their authority from God and could not therefore be held accountable for their actions by any earthly authority such as a parliament. Originating in Europe, the divine-right theory can be traced to the medieval conception of God’s award of temporal power to the political ruler, paralleling the award of spiritual power to the church. By the 16th and 17th centuries, however, the new national monarchs were asserting their authority in matters of both church and state. King James I of England (reigned 1603–25) was the foremost exponent of the divine right of kings, but the doctrine virtually disappeared from English politics after the Glorious Revolution (1688–89). In the late 17th and the 18th centuries, kings such as Louis XIV (1643–1715) of France continued to profit from the divine-right theory, even though many of them no longer had any truly religious belief in it. The American Revolution (1775–83), the French Revolution (1789), and the Napoleonic wars deprived the doctrine of most of its remaining credibility." [ii]

As time progressed this understanding was altered by a question of how this doctrine was administered beginning in medieval times. A controversy developed between the Church and secular rulers as to its origins. "All were agreed that it came ultimately from God who alone held the right over life and death. What was at issue was the route. The papacy held that it came through God's representative, the Church and its ministers. Anti-papalists, such as Dante, maintained that power in secular matters came directly from God to the monarch, whether he be elected or hereditary. The argument was revived in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries with the rise of absolute monarchs in France and England. In its extreme form, as stated in Basilikon Doron by King James I, it says that: (1) political power comes directly from God to a hereditary monarch; (2) that monarch has absolute power which cannot be in any way restrained; and (3) anyone who opposes the monarch in any way is guilty of treason and liable to death, and, possibly, damnation. Filmer gave divine right a patriarchal base by attempting to ground it on the authority God gave to Adam, as the father of the human race.

The doctrine was opposed by the Jesuits—Bellarmine and Suarez in particular. It was brutally set aside in England by Cromwell and in France by the Republic in 1792-3. In England it was revived by Charles II but died with the Glorious Revolution of 1688. — Cyril Barrett.[iii]

What may this Feast mean today?

What kind of king do we see in Jesus? Was he to be or was he ever a ruler king by Divine right? Apart from a few scriptures that use the title king what do many other words about him and his words and actions suggest to us?

To begin with, let us consider the birth narratives. They all seem to suggest a very modest and humble beginning. Of the four gospels only Matthew and Luke contain stories of the birth of Jesus. Matthew tells us that Mary and Joseph were only betrothed but Joseph is assured, quoting the prophet Isaiah, that the child would be "Emmanuel", meaning God with us and so they named him Jesus. Matthew then tells of the visit of the Magi who, by the leading of a star where they found him in a home in Bethlehem and knelt down to worship him and bring him gifts. He concludes his narrative by reporting the the flight into Egypt, Herod's massacre of the babies, and the return of Joseph and Mary to Egypt. Luke, at greater length and detail, begins with the birth of John the Baptist, including the Annunciation by the Angel to Mary, Mary's visit to John's parents, Zechariah and Elizabeth, and the birth of Jesus in a manger in Bethlem. In this very humble scene he does include the singing of an angelic multitude along with the visit of local shepherds. Their stories pose the idea of a king in their narratives but emphasize the presence of God in the life of the newborn Jesus.

His life was also a testament to simplicity as best we know. The Synoptic Gospels are the primary source of such knowledge and the details of his daily lifestyle are sparse. They speak of no lavish existential possessions or habits that might portray anything but simplicity. "Jesus calls some Jewish men to be his Twelve Apostles. None of them seems to have been a peasant (an agricultural worker). At least four are described as fishermen and another as a tax collector. Jesus speaks of the demands of discipleship, telling a rich man to sell his possessions and give the money to the poor. He states that his message divides family members against each other. Luke places a special emphasis on the women who followed Jesus, such as Mary Magdalene. In the Synoptic Gospels, Jesus speaks primarily about the Kingdom of God (or heaven). In Matthew and Luke, he speaks further about morality and prayer. His moral teachings in Matthew and Luke encourage unconditional self-sacrificing God-like love for God and for all people. During his sermons, he preached about service and humility, the forgiveness of sin, faith, turning the other cheek, love for one's enemies as well as friends, and the need to follow the spirit of the law in addition to the letter." [iv] Except for the large crowds he was said to attract by his preaching, there seems to be nothing to suggest anything but humility and simplicity.

During the final days, when he entered Jerusalem for the last time, we see clearly his humility when he enters on the back of a borrowed donkey. While our religious tradition often refers to this as his "triumphal entry" into the city, during the celebration we begin to see a humble and tragic end. There are many examples during these closing scenes that in no way reflect a king in the traditions of humanity. We begin to see what a king is like in the Realm of God, that kingdom that Jesus told us he was here to proclaim. His preparation is in prayer and communication in the solitude of a garden and away from the crowds. Jesus speaks about the realities and the clear distinctions of God's realm and the brutality of the kingdoms of this world. When he visits the Temple his actions point out the poverty of their worship showing their attention to temporal matters and not on the eternal values that count most for a good life. After this the Gospel of Mark tells us stories about the Fig Tree, the questioning of authority, the parable of the tenants in the vineyard, questions about taxes, and life after death. Before Mark moves toward the final events before the crucifixion, we read about the Great Commandment, Jesus warning the teachers of the Law, the widows offering, the discourse on the destruction of the Temple, and the horror that comes from the neglect of the eternal values that are a part of God's Realm.

During the Passover Meal that Jesus shares with his disciples he makes it clear that living their lives according to God's Realm on earth is no easy task. They will need to be nourished in the table fellowship that only God can provide for their sustenance. They cannot betray eternal principles by the use of physical violence as portrayed by the story of Peter cutting off one of the ears of a guard when they came for Jesus to take him awaway. They will need to stand firm and strong against the human judgements that stand against the peaceful authority of the creator of all that is. While you may be threatened by these temporal judgements with physical death, be aware that they cannot destroy the eternal life you have with all creation. We will be raised and transformed by the authority of the Creator's design like that of energy and matter, which are equal and fused with the speed of light squared, and cannot be destroyed but only transformed. Often, in Scripture, we are told that "God is Light" and in the theories of Science we may be just beginning to understand what all of this might mean?

The Feast of Christ the King, to me, has a whole new and comprehensive meaning as we end this Litirgical Year. As we move into this 21st century let us move forward in our interpretations to reflect our knowledge and understanding of our world today. The doctrine of absolute sovereignty no longer exists in most of our developed nations. Where the title of king or queen is still used almost none of them has absolute power and authority. Most nations are governed by laws that even the leadership is supposed to follow. This is why the dictionary defines a dictator, who attempts to rule sovereignly, as "a ruler who is unconstrained by law or a person who behaves in a tyrannical manner". Even our understanding of God's sovereignty, if that term is still used, is one primarily of love that calls us to respond in love to a righteousness with universal principles. These principles seemed to be shared by almost all faiths, especially those who celebrate and honor that Light that is the integral part of the universal equation of Relativity.

The Feast of Christ the King is a grand celebration and reminder of the wholeness of God's Realm. It brings together the eternal and the temporal as two aspects of the same. Our trend toward dualism has the tendency to separate and divide that which is whole. This celebration is a reminder of the relativity of the eternal and the temporal in the essence of life. The eternal and temporal are as equal as are energy and matter are equal. Christ the King is our Christian symbol and reminder of the mystery of the Light that enables the whole equation to be. The simple and yet profound seen in the vision of the burning bush from which the voice declared, "I Am", the verb to be! Just as the seven days of creation depict the mystery of the origin of a Universe of time and space, so the seven seasons of our liturgical year speak of the mysteries of life in the majesty of the Realm of God. The following are brief paragraphs to review these seven seasons of our Liturgical Year.

In Advent - we are asked to awaken and watch for that which is coming. A new cycle with new beginnings reminicent of the Big Bang, the singularity, that began the creation as we know it. Almost every religious tradition has something like the beginning of our yearly liturgical calendar called Advent. It is a time of renewal to call all of us forth to wake up and smell the coffee as I explain in my article on Advent. [Read the article on Advent]

We are invited again to use all of our senses and human intelligence to continue anew in ways that inspire and bring forth new things. While looking at progress from our past and dreaming about new possibilities for the future we are encouraged to use our productivity in the now to move forward in another year. Learning To Live Well is another series I wrote about such progress for living when anyone realizes these opportunities and awakens to probabilities, possibilities, and productivity in living well year after year. [Read the article on Probabilities]

I believe most agree that the main theme of Christmas is the great love of God for the whole world and how Jesus came to be the living word to announce and demonstrate this greatest of gifts – LOVE. Religious and non-religious people alike seem to talk about love and losing our affections for material things that more often diminish our humanity, especially in these lean economic times. Let us not become jealous because this extravagant love of God belongs to all of us, everywhere, at all times, and in all places. Is this not, my friends, the essence of the story of Christmas? The humble yet dramatic awareness of God’s love for our living together in this world; the wise and the foolish, the prominent and the poor, the people near and far, the angels above and the animals below are never separated from this love of God now and forever. [Read the article on Christmas]

The term epiphany means "to show" or "to make known" or even "to reveal." In Western churches, we recall the coming of the wise men bringing gifts to visit the Christ child, who by so doing "reveal" Jesus to the world as Lord and King. In the season of Epiphany we might try to learn about God and ourselves as the people of God. The Scriptures themselves give us clues of helpful ways to expand acquisition and knowledge. One of the Psalms is rather clear, “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge. There is no speech or language where their voice is not heard.”[iv] How grateful we can be for all of today’s science like Astronomy, Math, Physics, Chemistry, and many more. Religion, especially in the past, has often been very slow and resistant to accept these modern stories, learned from research, as accepted truth. [Read the article on Epiphany]

Just maybe, if we really think about it, Lent is the very tradition we need more than anything else if we are to survive in this 21st Century. Often I have heard leaders tell us, “If you do not come apart – you will come apart”. Everyone is familiar with “R & R” (Rest and Relaxation). It seems that most people work more than one job and take very little, if any, time for themselves. With the present economy we hear that many individuals and families, especially those who are out of work, do not have enough money to take a vacation. Is it surprising that people’s worlds are falling apart? Many people may have to start over or to at least renew whom they are in order to continue and move forward. A season of Lent may be helpful to many. [Read the article on Lent]

Not only do secular myths and practices dilute Easter, "the Feast of Resurrection", like other Christian holidays, but it can also be weakened by a misinterpretation of this illustrious Feast. The popular misconception of this primary announcement is resuscitation, coming back from the dead, rather than resurrection, being raised to a new life. This is a very important distinction if we are to get the full and complete picture of this far-reaching declaration in our personal lives. Easter is more that just a day in the life of Jesus or for an occasion in our lives after we have physically died. Easter is an experience that we can have multiple times throughout all the days of our life on this earth. [Read the article on Easter]

Pentecost can represent a lot of varied ideas and celebrations for religious communities and individuals. Briefly we have seen that it was a sacred time in our Jewish and Apostolic roots. For the Hebrews it was gratitude for the provisions of food and physical nourishment. For the Apostles, it was a unique awareness and coming of the presence of the Spirit of God. In Jewish custom it also became a time to include gratitude for the giving of the Law through Moses and the early church expanded it from one day to a whole season following Easter. In both cases these were primary days of celebration for acknowledging God’s gifts for the people of God. [Read the article on Pentecost]

As we close each Liturgical Year as followers of Jesus with the Feast of Christ the King let us consider how we might live out this celebration in our daily lives. Having considered the style of the kingship of Jesus as a humble and prayerful servant we might remember these words of Jesus in John's Gospel, "Very truly I tell you, whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father." (John 14:12 NIV) In the Christian scriptures of Peter and Paul we also have these words, "But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light." (2 Peter 2:9 NIV) "Now if we are children, then we are heirs--heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory." (Romans 8:17 NIV) In the closing book of the Christian testament of scripture these two verses stand out to suggest our partnership in the Realm of God, "You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God, and they will reign on the earth." (Revelation 5:10 NIV) - "and has made us to be a kingdom and priests to serve his God and Father--to him be glory and power for ever and ever! Amen." (Revelation 1:6 NIV)

What then are we doing with our lives to bring this Realm of God into our world now? We have come a long way in human history and yet there is so much more to be done. The resources of our earth are abundant, but not everyone shares equally. As a kingdom of priests, so to speak, are we fulfilling our calling appropriately so that the generousity of our earthly realm is properly disbursed? There are so many stories in our cultures and sacred myths that clearly admonish us to care and share. For Christians it is very clear, in the life and teachings of Jesus the Christ, as to the way we must live. Teaching about faithfulness Jesus said, "From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked." (Luke 12:48 NIV) If the doctrine of the divine right of kings is dead in our understanding today why replace it with another false doctrine regarding the wealthy? Since we acknowledge that we brought nothing into this world and know that we cannot take anything out of this world, why pretend that we are not equal in living? Whether we have been given much or have been entrusted with much - received or aquired it - our mission is clear.

What we need to be doing together in our world is also clear. The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are eight international development goals that all 192 United Nations member states and at least 23 international organizations have agreed to achieve by the year 2015. They include eradicating extreme poverty, reducing child mortality rates, fighting disease epidemics such as AIDS, and developing a global partnership for development.[v]

Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger

Goal 2: Achieve universal primary education

Goal 3: Promote gender equality and empower women

Goal 4: Reduce child mortality

Goal 5: Improve maternal health

Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases

Goal 7: Ensure environmental sustainability

Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development

How will all this ever come to pass? None of the above, along with many other hopes and dreams we may have for our future well being, will ever be accomplished without everyone’s cooperation and participation. The majority of our world wants peace and prosperity that will only become possible if we are people of PEACE - People Energizing Alternatives Causing Equality! We the people can bring this vision of God's Realm to a reality as soon as we actively energize our responsibilities and faithfully serve in this world as a "kingdom of priests". Utilizing our time, talent, and treasure we can insure this vision becomes a reality.

May the caring peace of God that goes beyond human comprehension, declare God's love for you in your heart and mind as we see it in Jesus Christ, and may the blessing of God, loving Creator, gracious Liberator, and life giving Spirit keep you steadfast now and always. Amen.

Monday, November 1, 2010

Why Fewer Attend Church Today?

Why Fewer Attend Church Today?

Why is church attendance decreasing as time moves forward? There are many reasons that come to mind from my experience as a retired Episcopal priest. In most of the developed nations, like those of Europe, attendance is already extremely low. According to Jeffrey Weiss, a correspondant for "Politics Daily", "Religion in America is on the decline and has been dropping since the turn of the century. That's not an atheist's happy dream. It's the conclusion of researchers at Faith Communities Today (FACT), the multi-year study of American religion quarterbacked by the Hartford Seminary's Hartford Institute for Religion Research." While he admits that statistics vary he pointed out that this particular report relied on information coming from pastors and religious leaders who might have wanted to say something more favorable. It is not just church attendance then that is in decline but religion itself.[i]

In an April 9, 2009 article by Jon Meacham for Newsweek Magazine, "The End of Christian America", he says, "The percentage of self-identified Christians has fallen 10 points in the past two decades. How that statistic explains who we are nowand what, as a nation, we are about to become.

It was a small detail, a point of comparison buried in the fifth paragraph on the 17th page of a 24-page summary of the 2009 American Religious Identification Survey. But as R. Albert Mohler Jr.president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, one of the largest on earthread over the document after its release in March, he was struck by a single sentence. For a believer like Mohlera starched, unflinchingly conservative Christian, steeped in the theology of his particular province of the faith, devoted to producing ministers who will preach the inerrancy of the Bible and the Gospel of Jesus Christ as the only means to eternal lifethe central news of the survey was troubling enough: the number of Americans who claim no religious affiliation has nearly doubled since 1990, rising from 8 to 15 percent. Then came the point he could not get out of his mind: while the unaffiliated have historically been concentrated in the Pacific Northwest, the report said, "this pattern has now changed, and the Northeast emerged in 2008 as the new stronghold of the religiously unidentified." As Mohler saw it, the historic foundation of America's religious culture was cracking."[ii]

Culture

With the "smaller" world in which we live and because of instant communications and faster means of travel we are aware of the many different cultures among us. It demonstrates that one culture is not necessarily superior nor better than another. We are growing to understand that one size does not fit all even if we do not always find it easy to respect others who differ. Later in the above article for Newsweek Jon continues, "While we remain a nation decisively shaped by religious faith, our politics and our culture are, in the main, less influenced by movements and arguments of an explicitly Christian character than they were even five years ago. I think this is a good thinggood for our political culture, which, as the American Founders saw, is complex and charged enough without attempting to compel or coerce religious belief or observance." In this very lengthy article he eventually refers to the thoughts of an early church father, St. Augustine, "If we apply an Augustinian test of nationhood to ourselves, we find that liberty, not religion, is what holds us together. In "The City of God," Augustine converted sinner and bishop of Hipposaid that a nation should be defined as "a multitude of rational beings in common agreement as to the objects of their love." What we value most highlywhat we collectively love mostis thus the central test of the social contract."

This spirit is basically what our founders believed and spelled out in our Constitution concerning the separation of church and state to disallow that any one religion would be primary but that all religions and human values were to be heard and respected. "This way of life is far different from what many overtly conservative Christians would like. But that is the power of the republican system engineered by James Madison at the end of the 18th century: that America would survive in direct relation to its ability to check extremism and preserve maximum personal liberty. Religious believers should welcome this; freedom for one sect means freedom for all sects." Meacham reminds us as his article continues. To promote the dogmatism of any single faith or belief only breeds strife and division. To work for inclusion and mutual respect for the ideas of others, according to St. Augustine, enables "a multitude of rational beings in common agreement as to the objects of their love." A people respecting and loving one another as we each are loved by God our Creator. May this grace of this maturity promote our becoming one nation under God.

We can be certain about one fact, change is not new and it will never go away. From the beginning of creation change began and has continued. Every aspect of life as we know it is evolving from what we consider innate material and even in the social orders that have been originated by humankind. The sad thing for me, as a religious leader, is the resistance of almost every religion and its ferver to resist change. Unfortunatly this attitude and reluctance to change not only has a negative effect on religion but it has brought death and devastation.

Education

All fields of knowledge and education have advanced with great speed in recent time. These advances have caused the development of specialties that branch off to study and research, especially in the areas of medicine. Not too long ago, since the time of my youth, one might aspire to become a medical doctor. That decision is no longer so simple. There is hardly an area of medicine that does not have multiple specialties so the choice is not simple nor is the study necessary to accomplish one's decision.

Scientific study and development seems to be a special problem for many religious people. Many are not amused nor fascinated by what they hear and do not seem to have an inclination to seek clarification. Their skepticism tends to produce fear more than answers since it is common for us to react with fear toward that which we do not fully understand. This tends to distance the thinking of those who seek easy answers and causes them to lash out with empty rhetoric and rebuttle. An example would be their reactions to scientific theory as if it was a proposition without substantiated facts.

Here is a paragraph from a paper I wrote posted on - http://janddhealth.com/ArtEMC2.htm:

While we still do not have all the answers, we have grown much in this pursuit. Many will say that it is just a theory in order to dismiss the findings of modern Physics and related sciences, but that does not solve much either. It may be important here to explain what is meant by a theory among the scientific community. In common usage, the word theory is often used to signify a conjecture, an opinion, a speculation, or a hypothesis. In this usage, a theory is not necessarily based on facts; in other words, it is not required to be consistent with the true descriptions of reality. (Wikipedia) In science a theory is a testable model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise verified through empirical observation. (Wikipedia) Another definition for scientific theory is an assumption or system of assumptions, accepted principles, and rules of procedure based on limited information or knowledge, devised to analyze, predict, or otherwise explain the nature or behavior of a specified set of phenomena; abstract reasoning. (MSN Encarta)

We need to encourage respectful dialog with each other with a desire for mutual and honest interactions. I believe this is why many of our youth and younger adults are absenting themselves from religious involvement. A theory in science makes no eternal claims for an unchanging truth. A theory can and will change if further imperical evidence shows variations from former evidence. Truth for science is changed without hesitation or apology as new experiments and mathematical formulas may reveal. Religion tends to promote the notion that their truths never change and cannot ever change. When dogmas are changed, as many are, have been, and will be, it takes years of verbal contention, accusations, and even physical violence. How can we forget the arrogance of hundreds of years by the church over the early theory that the earth was round and not flat and that the earth revolved around the sun? It was only recently that Galleleo was exonerated from the judgement of heresy while his theory was actually true. Religion continues today insisting that it's scriptures are inerrant and eternal truth when even their scriptures tell us that it is the heavens that declare the glory of God. Perhaps it is time for religion to join with science in recognizing that truth developes over time and that humanity has only grasped a small portion in its discoveries and can never claim infalability.

In science today there are some, like Paul Davies, who states that both science and religion are "founded on faith namely, on belief in the existence of something outside the universe, like an unexplained God or an unexplained set of physical laws, maybe even a huge ensemble of unseen universes, too. For that reason, both monotheistic religion and orthodox science fail to provide a complete account of physical existence.

This shared failing is no surprise, because the very notion of physical law is a theological one in the first place, a fact that makes many scientists squirm. Isaac Newton first got the idea of absolute, universal, perfect, immutable laws from the Christian doctrine that God created the world and ordered it in a rational way. Christians envisage God as upholding the natural order from beyond the universe, while physicists think of their laws as inhabiting an abstract transcendent realm of perfect mathematical relationships.

And just as Christians claim that the world depends utterly on God for its existence, while the converse is not the case, so physicists declare a similar asymmetry: the universe is governed by eternal laws (or meta-laws), but the laws are completely impervious to what happens in the universe."[iii]

It seems to me there is no hope of ever explaining why the physical universe is as it is so long as we are fixated on immutable laws or meta-laws that exist reasonlessly or are imposed by divine providence. The alternative is to regard the laws of physics and the universe they govern as part and parcel of a unitary system, and to be incorporated together within a common explanatory scheme. In other words, the laws should have an explanation from within the universe and not involve appealing to an external agency. The specifics of that explanation are a matter for future research. But until science comes up with a testable theory of the laws of the universe, its claim to be free of faith is manifestly bogus.

We now live in a world where knowledge is openly available to everyone who is literate around the globe. The Internet makes it possible along with our libraries. The media instantly tells us about things happening in places far and near. Our youth are growing up with technology and are more capable than many adults in these marvels of research and communication. People today are in touch with not only what is going on but also familiar with the multiplicity of cultures and ideas. This makes it very difficult for any individual or group to claim exclusivity to superior and ultimate truth. More than ever we must learn to love our neighbors as ourselves and recognize that our neiborhood is much larger than in former times.

Economics

"The economics of religion" (website) How does religion affect the economy? How do economic factors impact religious choices? With a few exceptions, economists have largely kept their practical mitts off the mystical topic of faith until recently. Now scholars in huge numbers are analyzing the intersection of faith and economics. They include people from a range of disciplines from across the United States and around the world, and students doing cutting-edge work. The excitement has even inspired an organization dedicated to the economics of religion, which formally kicked off in fall 2004 with a conference that attracted international research papers. Why it Matters: Peoples beliefs affect practical decisions in everyday life, including economic ones, and religious organizations can be powerful players in the secular realms of government and politics.[iv]

In their book, Sacred Trust - The Medieval Church as an Economic Firm by Robert B. Ekelund, Robert D. Tollison, Gary M. Anderson, Robert F. Hébert and Audrey B. Davidson, they offer this description, "Without meaning to be irreverent, it is fair to say that in the Middle Ages, at the height of its political and economic power, the Roman Catholic Church functioned in part as a powerful and sophisticated corporation. The Church dealt in a "product" many consumers felt they had to have: the salvation of their immortal souls. The Pope served as its CEO, the College of Cardinals as its board of directors, bishoprics and monasteries as its franchises. And while the Church certainly had moral and social goals, this early antecedent to AT&T and General Motors had economic motives and methods as well, seeking to maximize profits by eliminating competitors and extending its markets."[v]

Today there are volumes written about economics and how it relates to all religions. No religious institution can exist without financial support and there is no doubt that religion has a significant influence, both good and bad, on the economy of our world. With the evolution of time, in every respect, especially in the areas of culture and education the earlier need for the religious structures, needless to say, has changed dramatically as well. We can see this economic shift in various areas like; charity, counselling, schooling, and many other basic areas of our common life together. In the longer view of human history these basic areas of human need were not formalized. It was not too long ago that religious communities began to take leadership in organizing schools for children and showing care for those in need.

The beginning of established schools may have been The King's School in Canterbury England in the sixth century.[vi] In almost every century therafter there was a gradual increase in the number and variety of schools established. The majority of schools and colleges had the backing of the Crown or the Church. When you get to the sixteenth century there was a significant influx of new centers of academia. From 1500 - 1598, however, the great majority were in England. With the dawn of the seventeenth century educational and other service institutions for the populous were spreading to many parts of the world. Until the end of the nineteenth century the majority of education was provided for and supported by religious affiliation.[vii]

While counseling began with religion in later years, especially in our times now, it is mainly a practice of Psychology in the field of medicine. The history of counseling is rich and varied but these two paragraphs quoted here will give a brief summary.

"Christian counseling has been a part of the work of ministry from the origin of the Church. "Every since apostolic times, counseling has occurred in the Church as a natural function of corporate spiritual life." Paul made it clear that he considered the family of God competent to counsel one another when the need arose. He said, "I myself am convinced, my brothers, that you yourselves are full of goodness, complete in knowledge and competent to instruct (counsel) one another" (Romans 15:14 NIV)."

"In time, Christian ministers began to be aware that they were no longer looked to for answers on problems of living, as they once were. Indeed, the unspoken consensus was that Christianity did not have answers for these new problems. Not only did the humanists believe this; Christians themselves came to hold the same position. The liberals in the Church addressed these serious problems of living by Christians, either by "deferring and referring" to "those properly trained to deal with 'real' problems," (psychologists or psychiatrist) or by obtaining the psychological training that would equip them to this task. The conservatives saw the problem as a lack of commitment, bible study, prayer, and faithful attendance of all the church services. In other words, they denied its existence."[viii]

"Charity was a part of western civilisation long before it was nationalised. Charity has been a virtue recognised and fostered by religion throughout human history. Christian charity has been an integral part of European civilization. In medieval Europe the Church bore the responsibility for organising and promoting poor relief and it was not until the 16th century that the state began to take over this responsibility."[ix]

As you can see from this paragraph from the web, charity was also forstered by religion but, as time moved forward, it too has become an integral part of our secular fabric of life. It is hard to know what percentage of charity is from strictly religious sources in our world today.

Welcome

Last but certainly not least - perhaps the most important reason for fewer coming to church today. Another word for welcome is hospitality. "Hospitality is not merely making space for somebody else, its about letting people into your hearts and letting them change you. [The Rev. Canon Timothy Boggs, Washington National Cathedral]

These words, All Are Welcome, are used on many signs for churches and other groups who gather, imply full hospitality. I admire the seeming intention of these words because they not only reflect the extent of Gods love for everyone but they echo the spirit of our United States Bill of Rights and our Constitution. It is almost natural therefore to see that All Are Welcome on so many signs.

It is not uncommon that many people say things that they believe they mean but too often neglect by their actions toward others. This malady is reflected in a popular statement that would remind us, actions speak louder than words. Words are very important indeed since they are indicators of our intentions but are rather empty if there is no corresponding action to make them effective. It is important to say I love you to those for whom you care but it is more important that you show that love by tangible expressions.

Everyone basically understands the first two words, All Are, but perhaps we need some help on the meaning of Welcome. Here is an acronym that may help:

WELCOME Willingly Engage Limitless Care Opening More Equality

A true welcome requires CHANGE; a word that we understand but find hard to like and execute. It is especially difficult for those who are comfortable where and how they are. This is why it is easier for welcome to mean that the newer folk who join them will be expected to adapt and change to the existing demeanor of the group they are joining. True welcome, however, will bring change to both the existing community and the new members. The physical principle states, For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Perhaps this best describes why and how change will occur for both the older and newer members. Since change is so hard for so many to accept we can see why a real welcoming community will feel stress and discomfort in the process.

Only when both the community and the newcomers are willing to limitless engagement in a open and caring manner will the needed equality and true welcome be a result. Because All Are Welcome is so life changing for everyone involved it is very difficult to experience in fact. It is hard for people to be open enough to practice regularly and easily the function of All Are Welcome. It is always easier to welcome those who are placid and pliable and tend to fit in almost without notice. It is always more difficult for opposites to attract without a genuine love for the humanity that is there.

The fact is, as we often hear, that opposites attract. Two people who are basically alike cannot achieve as much as when two people who are not so much alike come together. The reason is simple. Two people with similar gifts and thought will not have the impetus for growth and development as two people with differing thoughts and talents! We know this to be a fact genetically so our laws do not allow inbreeding. Groups who primarily continue to propagate their heredity of unchanging tradition may not flourish well either. The best example of the value of inclusiveness is our own United States of America the melting pot of many nations and peoples.

In short, it is far easier to say All Are Welcome than to live All Are Welcome, but if it is not our lifestyle then our chances of health and well being as a community is very slim.

For all of these reasons and more, I believe we are seeing a decline in the number of people who affiliate with and attend our churches. People move often today from one place to another, as we have become a mobile society. It is interesting to note that, when they move, they do not necessarily attend nor affiliate with the same denomination. Brand loyalty, as it were, is not the way it used to be in years past. Change often brings more change as people get used to having movement and development in their daily lives. If their experience with church in their former location was especially meaningful then they may search for a similar community in which to continue that experience in their new area. When they choose to look, the web is probably the most important place for their search. When they visit, if the church seems to be as it was described in their website, they may choose to affiliate and participate. The most important part of any church today is perhaps learning how to tell their story effectively and honestly so that people around them may see why they might feel welcomed. Mega churches do this very well and, because of their larger size, often have the variety that meets the needs and interests of more people.